A senior journalist with Australia’s nationwide broadcaster says she was successfully pushed out of India after her reporting on Sikh separatism angered the Indian authorities, accusing the authorities of hindering her from going to occasions, looking for to have her reporting taken down and refusing for weeks to resume her visa.
Avani Dias, the South Asia correspondent for the Australian Broadcasting Company, stated on social media that Indian officers advised her final month that her utility for a resident journalist visa extension wouldn’t be authorized as a result of a tv section she had produced on accusations that India was liable for the killing of a Sikh activist in Canada had “crossed the road.”
She was finally granted a short lived visa extension on the final minute after lobbying by the Australian authorities, lower than a day earlier than she was scheduled to depart the nation, Ms. Dias stated in her podcast, “Searching for Modi.” However she stated that she in the end determined to depart as a result of “it felt too troublesome to do my job in India.”
“I used to be struggling to get into public occasions run by Modi’s occasion,” Ms. Dias stated on the podcast, which was about Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The Indian authorities has disputed Ms. Dias’ account and stated she was assured by excessive rating officers that her visa can be renewed.
Her departure got here amid a broader crackdown on free speech within the nation and raids on journalists reporting on delicate matters. Throughout his 10 years main the nation, Mr. Modi has consolidated energy in India and throughout its establishments, difficult the founding rules of contemporary India, like secularism and freedom of the press. He’s looking for a third time period in parliamentary elections that begun this month.
In March, Ms. Dias produced a tv section concerning the accusations made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada final yr that brokers appearing on behalf of the Indian authorities had been behind the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist, on Canadian soil. The half-hour documentary examined the motion, which advocates for a separate Sikh state known as Khalistan to be carved out of the Indian state of Punjab.
Throughout the half-hour documentary, which was broadcast in Australia and uploaded on social media, she detailed how permission for her and her crew to movie on the border between Punjab and Pakistan had all of the sudden been revoked by Indian officers with out clarification, and the way she had been quizzed by Indian officers about her crew and the locations she had visited to report on the story.
“It’s clear that we’re being actually monitored and that there’s concern concerning the story that we’re doing,” she stated.
On March 26, lower than every week after the documentary was broadcast, the Indian authorities efficiently sought to have YouTube block the video from displaying in India.
The subsequent day, Ms. Dias was advised by a consultant of the Ministry of Exterior Affairs that her utility for a visa extension wouldn’t be renewed, in accordance with an individual immediately aware of the state of affairs however who spoke on situation of anonymity due to the delicate nature of the problem. Ms. Dias notified the Australian authorities, and Australian diplomats started to foyer for her visa, the particular person stated.
After weeks of bureaucratic backwards and forwards, Ms. Dias obtained her visa extension on the night of Apr. 18, the particular person stated. However together with her flight again to Australia departing the subsequent day, and having already packed up her life in India, she made the choice to depart, Ms. Dias stated in her podcast. She left on the primary day of voting in India’s nationwide election.
A senior Indian official, talking on situation of anonymity, refuted her account, saying Ms. Dias had been advised properly prematurely that her visa can be prolonged.
The official stated that Ms. Dias had violated phrases of her earlier visa by trying to movie on the India-Pakistan border, which requires permission. Ms. Dias beforehand stated she had sought and been granted that permission earlier than it was revoked on the final minute.
Ms. Dias had not been prevented from protecting India’s election, however had her accreditation delayed as a result of she had not but obtained her visa extension, the Indian official stated, including that her colleagues on the Australian Broadcasting Company had been given accreditation to cowl the elections.
Ms. Dias’ departure provides to mounting considerations about press freedom in India, the place Indian journalists have come beneath heavy strain from the Modi administration.
Overseas journalists in India are reporting extra strain, as properly. In February, Vanessa Dougnac, a French freelance correspondent, stated she had been compelled to depart India, the place she had lived for 25 years, after the authorities advised her that they supposed to withdraw her everlasting residency allow.
The authorities accused her of manufacturing reporting that was “malicious and demanding in method,” and making a “biased damaging notion about India.” They stated that she had labored as a journalist with out holding a legitimate allow, after revoking her work allow in September 2022 and not using a clear motive.
