Ghaziabad, India – It’s near midnight. Ruchika Sharma sits in her makeshift studio at her house in Ghaziabad, a metropolis simply exterior India’s capital, New Delhi, a small mic hooked to her shirt. The 33-year-old historian and former professor is preparing for her newest YouTube video present.
The recording hours are odd, however it’s a thought-about resolution. There may be little ambient noise right now, she causes. For an unbiased creator like Sharma, a studio with fancy audio setups and soundproofing is past attain – particularly since she is aware of that every video she places out makes it more durable for her to land a job.
Sharma appears to be like at a telephone that doubles as a teleprompter. One other telephone serves as her recording rig. On two small wood racks held on the cream-coloured wall behind Sharma, sit a dozen historical past books. Additionally on the wall are an image of Indian revolutionary icon Bhagat Singh, who was hanged by the British colonial regime in 1931, and a replica of the Seventeenth-century portray of the Sasanian king Khosrow Parviz’s first sight of his Christian spouse Shirin, bathing in a pool.
On her wood desk, alongside tripods and ring lights is an eclectic mixture of beauty merchandise: brushes, mascara, concealer, powder puff, and, most essential of all, eyeshadow.
She hits the document button.
Sharma begins with an introduction to Nalanda, a sixth-century Buddhist college in northern India that was house to 9 million manuscripts and was burned down in a serious fireplace within the twelfth century. A extensively held perception – promoted by sections of India’s Hindu proper, amplified by a government-run modern-day model of Nalanda College, and referenced in a number of information articles – means that Nalanda was destroyed by a Muslim normal named Bakhtiyar Khilji.
Sharma calls this one of many “largest myths of Indian historical past” earlier than citing a slew of historic sources that she says buttress her assertion. These sources, which she says are sometimes cited by those that paint Khilji as Nalanda’s villain, don’t truly consult with the college in any respect, she factors out. As a substitute, she says, the sources recommend Khilji attacked one other Buddhist college, the place many individuals have been killed in his assault.
Halfway by the narration, she picks up a bottle of concealer and applies it beneath her eyes. She drops a sarcastic joke – telling her viewers that she is citing the exact same sources that WhatsApp forwards pushing doubtful or faux historical past are inclined to quote. A sponge comes out to mix with the pores and skin tone, and shortly, a lilac eyeshadow is in place.
At a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities and its Hindu nationalist allies face allegations of rewriting historical past, turning the previous right into a political battleground for the long run, these unconventional historical past classes, laced with make-up and satire, are Sharma’s try at setting the document straight.
With greater than 200 YouTube movies in simply over two years, the historian is constructing a rising viewers: Her YouTube channel, Eyeshadow & Etihaas, has practically 20,000 subscribers, whereas on X, the place she amplifies the arguments she makes in her movies, she has 30,000 followers.
However maybe the most important testomony to her mounting affect lies within the threats and abuse she routinely receives for her movies. They’re a badge of honour she shrugs off, however would moderately not should put on.
“I typically get such dying threats. Rape remarks maintain coming,” she says. “They not work on me.”
Eyeshadow and historical past
Sharma grew up surrounded by historical past, in a household formed – like thousands and thousands of others – by India’s trendy tumult.
A grandchild of partition refugees, Sharma spent her childhood in Mehrauli, New Delhi’s oldest surviving inhabited space. After India’s cleavage at independence in 1947, her grandparents, each Punjabis from present-day Pakistan, discovered sanctuary within the neighbourhood and acquired land on which they constructed a house.
She thinks of the tales of partition she heard from them as her first brush with historical past. From her terrace, she would watch Qutb Minar, a five-story purple and buff sandstone tower constructed within the twelfth and thirteenth centuries by Muslim rulers that’s as a lot a landmark of New Delhi because the Eiffel Tower is of Paris. “I’ve a powerful emotional reference to it. I feel that monument is gorgeous,” Sharma says.
When she was 13, her dad and mom determined they wanted more room and moved out of the household home to Ghaziabad, a neighbouring district of Delhi, the place she lives together with her elder sister and her 61-year-old mom, a retired authorities official who labored at Indian Oil, a authorities oil and gasoline company. Sharma misplaced her father to most cancers in 2017.
Sharma says she was all the time all in favour of eye make-up. She would put on kohl in highschool. She started utilizing lip gloss in school, and through her PhD in 2020, she began making use of eye make-up and lipstick to deal with an abusive relationship.
“I used to be in a bodily and mentally abusive relationship for 10 years, battling PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder], and scary ideas of self-harm. I used to be in remedy for it,” she explains.
Sharma noticed an eyeshadow YouTube video that caught her consideration. “Watching eyeshadow movies, seeing the colors organized in palettes, and placing them on my eyelids was extremely therapeutic for me. It could calm me down,” remarked Sharma.
She was instructing in a university on the time and would purchase eyeshadow palettes, although her mom disapproved of it.
“I’ve by no means worn make-up in my life, even to events or weddings. I don’t like her make-up and clothes type. I’m conservative and spiritual, and I come from a unique era and interval,” mentioned her mom, who requested anonymity.
Her mom’s different concern was that Sharma was spending an excessive amount of cash on costly eyeshadow palettes.
As with make-up, Sharma’s educational pursuit of historical past was not one thing her dad and mom supported initially.
Sharma was in eighth grade when a historical past instructor who she remembers as “Sheila ma’am” modified her view of the topic. Till then, she says, academics would ask college students to underline essential dates and moments in historical past of their textbooks, after which memorise them.
“Nonetheless, at our first lesson with Sheila ma’am, she mentioned that historical past couldn’t be taught utilizing a single textbook and that she would give us lectures like they do in schools, and that we must take notes,” Sharma says. “Initially, I believed I’d fail the historical past examination.”
Sharma started to go to the varsity library steadily and examine any historical past books she got here throughout, discovering the method fascinating. Sharma received 94 percentile in tenth grade and took up humanities in highschool.
Sharma received into Woman Shri Ram School, considered one of New Delhi’s high arts establishments, for her undergraduate research, however her dad and mom believed there was no future in historical past and pressured her into taking on an undergraduate programme in enterprise research.
Contemporary out of faculty on the age of 21, she was recruited by a high-paying company agency. She left her job after simply 4 months. She was bored. “I realised I wanted to return to historical past. My dad and mom weren’t very captivated with my change of plans,” she says.
Sharma had continued to learn historical past as a interest throughout her undergraduate years. One ebook influenced her above all others – The Hindus: An Various Historical past, by American historian Wendy Doniger, who was focused by the Hindu right-wing who claimed that her ebook vilified the Hindu faith. Publishers subsequently pulled the ebook from the Indian market in 2014, elevating widespread considerations concerning the state of free speech in India.
Making the leap from a company life to return to highschool, she joined Jawaharlal Nehru College (JNU), which recurrently ranks as amongst India’s high analysis universities, for her grasp’s and PhD in historical past.
Sharma took up a contractual instructing place at Indraprastha School For Girls in Delhi College. And in mid-2022, as bodily courses resumed after COVID-19 circumstances dipped, Sharma began sporting eyeshadow to campus. “My college students have been very piqued by it and inspired me to begin a YouTube channel the place I may present make-up tutorials,” she says. “I declined. however then a pupil proposed that I speak about historical past whereas placing on eye make-up”.
That intrigued her. She learn up on-line on tips on how to begin a YouTube channel. And two weeks later, she recorded her first episode the place she matched her blue outfit with blue eyeshadow.
Her first video was a visit down reminiscence lane: a 28-minute episode about Qutb Minar, the place she mentioned the monument’s historical past and building, its structure, and the historical past of structure and design in Islam.
That first video, which she described as an experiment, introduced her over 400 subscribers within the first few days.
Sharma, the YouTube historian, was born.
‘Can not let these myths slide’
Fantasy-busting was not the concept behind her YouTube channel initially, she says. She needed to introduce folks to features of Indian historical past that they have been unfamiliar with.
She quickly began recording movies on architectural reuse, non-vegetarian meals in Indian historical past, gay and interfaith relationships within the Mughal interval, and Sati, an historical Hindu follow wherein widows would burn to dying by sitting atop their deceased husbands’ funeral pyres.
However the feedback she noticed beneath her movies typically had little to do with the content material of what she had mentioned.
“Folks used to remark lots on movies concerning the Mughals breaking temples and oppressing Hindus. That is how I discovered concerning the widespread myths, which I compiled right into a video debunking the ten largest myths about Mughals,” she explains.
With every video, the responses alerted her to extra historic myths, half-truths and cases of complicated themes from the previous that have been typically offered publicly with out context.
“Initially, the trolling and abuse I obtained for my movies affected me tremendously,” she says. Her previous psychological well being struggles compounded the harm, she mentioned. “However over time, I grew to become immune.”
Since then, she has had no scarcity of fabric to work with: from the razing of Hindu temples, ostensibly by medieval Muslim rulers; to tales of atrocities dedicated by these rulers that remove nuance.
These are topics which can be typically invoked by leaders of Prime Minister Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Get together and their allies to color India’s historical past as one full of the oppression of Hindus by Muslims – a story that critics have lengthy warned feeds into the demonisation of India’s 200 million Muslims. In an animated Instagram video in late April that the platform later took down, the BJP portrayed India as a Hindu land pillaged by Muslim raiders for hundreds of years. In truth, Islam arrived within the Indian subcontinent as early because the seventh century – a lot earlier than Khilji, the Mughals and different Muslim rulers and commanders.
Underneath Modi, college textbooks have been modified to include this Hindu nationalist studying of historical past – together with solutions {that a} Vedic sage was the “father of aviation” and that atomic science was recognized to historical Hindus.
“I can not simply let these myths slide,” Sharma says.
“Traces have been all the time blurred in India between historical past, religion and politics. However what has modified is that blurring of traces has led to violence,” she provides, arguing that the portrayal of Indian Muslims as historic villains has helped make it simpler for Hindu majoritarian politicians and mobs to focus on them. Since Modi got here to energy in 2014, hate crimes – together with lynchings – in opposition to Muslims have skyrocketed.
No determine in Indian historical past evokes the sort of hatred in Hindu nationalist historic accounts that Aurangzeb, the final main Mughal emperor does. He’s accused of getting killed a whole bunch of hundreds of Hindus, committing unimaginable atrocities on his ‘kafir’ (infidel) topics, and razing down spiritual websites of ‘non-believers’.
Sharma believes this portrayal of Aurangzeb ignores the time he lived in.
“Aurangzeb arrived at a essential juncture within the historical past of the Mughal Empire when the empire was on the verge of disintegration,” she says. The wars he waged had “little to do with faith”, and have been “all about political conquest”.
Breaking temples constructed or patronised by defeated kings was the norm on the time, she says – one which Hindu kings too had lengthy adopted. The concept was easy: Such temples have been seen as manifestations of the previous sovereign’s authority. Aurangzeb adopted that follow, whereas no less than 25 new Hindu temples additionally got here up beneath his reign, Sharma says.
But, the extensively held picture of Aurangzeb as a very evil king has real-world penalties for many who differ. The Mughal king can be eulogised by some for having practised a humble life-style and for his spiritual information. This landed a 14-year-old Muslim boy in hassle. In June 2023, police arrested a young person for placing up a social media standing praising Aurangzeb, after receiving complaints.
“This concept is that as a result of Aurangzeb broke a temple, so I’ll break this particular person’s home as a result of he’s a Muslim and since I feel Aurangzeb and this particular person are the identical,” Sharma says.
In keeping with Abhilash Mallick, an affiliate editor of the fact-checking unit of The Quint, an India-based digital information organisation, historical past is difficult to fact-check as a result of “we’re unable to offer a sure or no reply”.
“So we should cite historians and their analysis after which permit the reader to attract their very own conclusions,” he says. “We’d like individuals who can simplify historical past in movies and provides every kind of proofs in the identical hyperlink. Movies work finest. Folks devour them essentially the most.”
That’s the place Sharma is available in. “She removes the historic jargon and makes movies in Hindi which is what I like about Ruchika’s method,” he says.
As India votes in its seven-phase nationwide election, the race between the politicisation of historical past and makes an attempt to counter myth-making has solely grown in depth.
In late April, Sharma determined to tackle a very highly effective opponent – Prime Minister Modi himself.
Who’s an ‘outsider’?
Talking at an election rally within the western Indian state of Rajasthan on April 21, Modi appeared to explain Indian Muslims as “infiltrators” in making an attempt to recommend that the opposition Congress needed to take the personal property of Hindus and distribute them amongst Muslims.
Inside hours, Sharma posted a hyperlink on X, referencing a video of Modi’s feedback and pointing to a YouTube episode of her present, difficult frequent beliefs concerning the Mughal empire that dominated India from 1526-1719 AD, although weaker kings from the dynasty continued to regulate an ever-shrinking empire all the best way as much as 1857.
The Mughal video, like all of Sharma’s historical past movies, begins with a greater than one-minute preview of the video, adopted by her introduction, wherein she lists her credentials and tells viewers that her channel is a “ardour venture”.
Sharma applies a reddish eyeshadow that matches her purple high. All through the video, she combines memes and Bollywood music to inject humour. Three minutes into the video, she picks up a pores and skin serum and pours a couple of drops on her proper palm as she takes on the primary fantasy – that the Mughals have been outsiders.
She discusses how, except for Babur, the dynasty’s founder, and his son Humayun, the rest of the Mughal rulers have been born in India. Mughal meals and clothes, she claims, at the moment are commonplace in most Indian households. She discusses trendy borders and the concept of countries and the way they emerged centuries after the Mughals, and the way by immediately’s notions of nationhood, many of the dynasties that dominated India would have had roots that would make them “outsiders”.
Sharma then picks up a concealer and begins making use of it to her left eye as she debunks the second fantasy: that the Mughals have been particularly violent.
She refers to solutions that the Mughals burned all paperwork previous to their rule. She explains how the Mughals preserved the histories and texts of the traditional Indian interval by translations, similar to Razmnama, a Persian translation of the Hindu epic Mahabharata.
A provocative query follows: “If paperwork weren’t burned, did they burn folks?” she asks, earlier than answering herself.
“Perhaps as a lot as another kings in India burned,” she says, explaining that the Mughals, whereas violent, had a monitor document no worse than many different rulers of the time.
However combating historic battles in India’s current, surcharged political setting has dangers. Doing so whereas wielding an eyeliner as a weapon is even more durable – as Sharma has discovered.
‘I don’t need to rot in jail’
From labelling her a pseudo-historian and questioning her credentials to hypersexualised slander, the net abuse that Sharma faces is as wide-ranging because the make-up instruments on her desk and the slices from historical past she clinically dissects.
Sharma admits that when she first began creating the movies, she nervous she wouldn’t be capable of stand up to the trolling. “They name me ugly. They assume I’m a [religious] convert. They name me a mulli and a jihadi,” she says. Mulli is a derogatory phrase used to slander Muslim girls.
“However I’ve come to grasp now I’ve a thicker pores and skin.”
Nonetheless, she feels let down by her personal friends. Sharma typically hears from members of academia – together with feminine historians – that she is cheapening historical past by speaking about it whereas placing on make-up in entrance of a digicam. “Girls have internalised this concept that in the event that they need to be taken significantly, they should invisibilise their physique and desexualise themselves,” Sharma says. “You shouldn’t have to decide on between femininity and academia.”
Meena Bhargava, a retired historical past professor at Delhi College’s Indraprastha School for Girls, believes that few lecturers are keen to talk out in India’s present political local weather, the place many universities have cracked down on critics of the Modi authorities.
“Some historians merely hand over. We’ve talked so many instances after which grown drained that folks aren’t altering. Regardless of the harassment, Ruchika routinely posts historic movies on her YouTube account, which is encouraging,” says Bhargava.
Teachers “who seem easy and wearing a saree could also be talking nonsense”, she says.
“Then there’s Ruchika, who’s flashy, trendy, and wears stylish garments. Regardless of all this, she is aware of what she is speaking about.”
Sharma says Indian historians have a “social duty” to convey correct historical past to the general public – however that for essentially the most half, they’ve failed. “Historians are glad writing journals that solely 5 folks learn,” Sharma says.
She chooses to make her movies in Hindi, moderately than English, to succeed in a bigger Indian viewers.
However as her viewership grows, so does – she believes – the goal on her again. Sharma has utilized for assistant professor positions at greater than two dozen Delhi College schools since 2022, after her short-term contract job at Indraprastha School was over, however has not been capable of land a job. That’s no coincidence, she says.
Typically, she says, questions requested throughout interviews are makes an attempt to tease out the interviewee’s ideology. She speaks of an incident the place the interviewer turned out to be a senior historian aligned with the present authorities, whom she had confronted in a separate panel dialogue earlier. Throughout the job interview, she says, he inquired about current archaeological excavations at a Mughal palace and talked about the invention of temple stays there.
“He requested me why they found temple stays there. I informed him that one can discover many issues throughout excavation and that archaeology could be very layered,” she remembers. “He mentioned, ‘Why is it that solely beneath mosques do you discover stays of temples?’”
Sharma knew then that she wouldn’t get the job.
Now, she says, she goes to interviews with none expectations that she is likely to be chosen. “One Google search and anybody will find out about my ideology and the federal government doesn’t need any person like me.”
It’s not simply her profession that’s on the road: Dozens of critics of the Modi authorities, together with journalists and lecturers, have been arrested over the previous decade, many on costs that rights teams have described as extreme or motivated.
Sharma doesn’t need to be a part of them.
“I don’t need to rot in jail. I don’t see the purpose of it. I’d moderately say what I can moderately than say one thing that would ultimately land me in jail,” she says earlier than turning to the humour that always marks her movies too. “I can do significantly better work if I keep exterior.”
Her mom worries about her daughter. “I maintain telling her to stop this work. I really feel scared,” she says.
Sharma has requested her mom to not share her movies in household WhatsApp teams and worries about being recognised in public. “I normally don’t inform her that I get dying threats however she additionally has it in her mind that individuals are attending to know me and she or he tells me that I ought to put on a masks once I go exterior,” says Sharma.
However regardless of her fears, Sharma shouldn’t be prepared to surrender but.
In her makeshift studio, it’s time for a retake, so she sifts by brushes and picks the eye-shadow palette. She gently brushes the eyeshadow on her left eyelid. “I’ll proceed making movies so long as they let me.”
