NASA to quickly resume awards of lunar lander missions

LAS VEGAS — NASA plans to quickly make its first robotic lunar lander awards in additional than a 12 months because the company and the business grapple with uncertainty within the general program linked to the cancellation of a rover mission.

Throughout a panel dialogue on the AIAA ASCEND convention Aug. 1, Chris Culbert, supervisor of NASA’s Business Lunar Payload Providers (CLPS) program, stated the company was “very shut” to awarding a process order often known as CP-22 for a lander to the south pole of the moon.

The award can be the primary for a CLPS lander mission since the company chosen Firefly Aerospace in March 2023 for a touchdown on the far aspect of the moon. NASA had delayed the choose of a supplier for CP-22 and one other mission, known as CP-21, that may ship a lander to a area of the moon known as the Gruithuisen Domes.

“We’ve had a reasonably vital delay since our final process order. A part of that’s as a result of we discovered some classes on these first two missions,” he stated, a reference to Astrobotic’s Peregrine and Intuitive Machines’ IM-1 missions that launched earlier this 12 months. “We needed to take that under consideration and make some adjustments to probably the most present process order.”

“We’re very shut now to awarding the following process order, known as CP-22,” he stated. That will probably be adopted by CP-21 “by the top of the 12 months.”

NASA officers have beforehand mentioned their intent to award two CLPS process orders a 12 months to supply an everyday cadence of missions to the moon. Culbert confirmed these plans, saying NASA will award two extra process orders in 2025. “Over the following 16 to 18 months, we may award as many as 4 process orders,” he stated. “We went a bit of sluggish final 12 months, however we discovered some vital classes.”

That’s welcome information to the businesses bidding on these missions. “Issues have slowed down a bit of bit over the past 12 months as we went into the primary couple of missions,” stated Trent Martin, senior vice chairman of area programs at Intuitive Machines, on the panel. “I really feel like that cadence will choose again up once more.”

Nevertheless, he expressed a priority with how CLPS is structured. NASA chosen 14 corporations to be part of CLPS, permitting them to bid on particular person process orders. (A type of, Masten Area Programs, has since gone bankrupt.) He argued that pool of bidders is just too giant.

“There’s too many corporations within the pool proper now,” he stated. “There should not sufficient missions to help 13 corporations.”

He added he was happy that NASA was now emphasizing previous efficiency on CLPS process order proposals. That enables corporations with “confirmed success,” he stated, to win a “regular provide of missions that permit us to broaden past CLPS and supply good high quality merchandise to CLPS.”

VIPER repercussions

The panel passed off two weeks after NASA canceled the Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rove (VIPER) mission, which was by far the biggest and most costly mission flying to the moon on CLPS. NASA is retaining the duty order it awarded to Astrobotic for delivering VIPER on that firm’s Griffin lander, with plans to fly different payloads or a mass simulator instead of VIPER.

Work on Griffin continues, stated Dan Hendrickson, vice chairman of enterprise growth at Astrobotic, with the lander on observe to launch in September 2025. “It’s a disappointing resolution,” he stated of VIPER’s cancellation, “however we’re shifting ahead.”

Griffin will nonetheless carry three business payloads, one in every of which is from the European Area Company. “We’re evaluating proper now the potential of different potential payloads becoming a member of this mission,” he stated.

Culbert stated NASA’s resolution to cancel VIPER had nothing to do with the failure of Astrobotic’s Peregrine lander, which suffered a propellant leak hours after liftoff that saved it from trying a touchdown. “We’re glad that they each perceive the issue and know the way to resolve it,” he stated. “I don’t suppose we’ve got any insecurity. I don’t suppose there’s any cause to imagine that the Griffin mission can be challenged by that exact failure.”

He added that there haven’t been different adjustments to the CLPS program within the wake of the VIPER cancellation resolution, however cautioned that efforts to revive VIPER by scientists and different advocates for the mission may have repercussions for this system. Company officers stated within the announcement of the VIPER cancellation that the prices required to finish and launch the rover may require the company to cuts different CLPS missions.

NASA’s price range, he stated, is a “zero-sum sport,” with will increase in a single space requiring offsets in others. “In the event you cease one thing as a result of you may’t afford it after which revive it, one thing else must be stopped,” he stated. “Might it’s a CLPS mission? Sure, however I might hope it isn’t.”

Hendrickson stated that, ought to Congress overrule NASA and direct the company to fly VIPER, Astrobotic would nonetheless be capable to fly the rover on the Griffin lander subsequent September.

Associated