
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
After the primary premium Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite-powered laptops launched earlier this 12 months, the cellular silicon maker introduced a extra budget-friendly Plus model of its Arm-based chip for Home windows. This week, the introduction of an eight-core Snapdragon X Plus mode made issues much more attention-grabbing for reasonably priced laptops.
If you’d like the battery and AI advantages of a Copilot Plus PC however with out the flagship prices, you’ll in all probability be occupied with one in every of these new chips, as long as it performs decently. At IFA 2024, we attended a benchmarking session to place the brand new chip via its paces.
Qualcomm had two fashions to showcase. The next-end reference laptop computer sporting the X1P-46-100 chip and an Asus Vivobook S15 with essentially the most reasonably priced X1P-42-100 variant. You may see their specs under.
Qualcomm Reference Design | ASUS Vivobook S15 | |
---|---|---|
Chipset |
Qualcomm Reference Design
X1P-46-100 |
ASUS Vivobook S15
X1P-42-100 |
CPU Cores |
Qualcomm Reference Design
8 |
ASUS Vivobook S15
8 |
CPU Max Clocks |
Qualcomm Reference Design
4.0GHz single-core increase |
ASUS Vivobook S15
3.2GHz single-core increase |
GPU |
Qualcomm Reference Design
2.1 TFLOPS |
ASUS Vivobook S15
1.7 TFLOPS |
NPU |
Qualcomm Reference Design
45 TOPS |
ASUS Vivobook S15
45 TOPS |
We additionally grabbed the outcomes from our earlier Snapdragon X Elite benchmarking session to see how the brand new chip compares to its larger brother and a few of Apple’s silicon we’d beforehand examined.
As you’d count on, the drop-down from twelve Oryon CPU cores within the X Elite chip to only eight within the new, a lot smaller Plus mannequin has a giant impact on multi-core CPU efficiency. Geekbench 6 is about 25% slower than Qualcomm’s beefiest configuration, and CineBench 2024 is a whopping 45% slower for the X1P-42 mannequin, seemingly owing to the smaller 30MB cache, down from 42MB.
There is a large efficiency hole between these two 8 core chips. Select correctly.
Identical to the varied Elite chip variations, single-core efficiency relies upon lots on which of the Plus fashions you get as properly, owing to their peak clock pace variations. The weakest X1P-42 mannequin is about 20% slower, whereas the X1P-46 is just 8% off the tempo of Qualcomm’s most power-hungry X Elite implementation. That is mirrored within the graphics division too, the place a considerably weaker Adreno GPU implementation (simply 1.7 and a couple of.1 TFLOPs versus 3.8 TFLOP in most Elite laptops) sees the 2 Plus fashions drop properly off the tempo of the Elite, which isn’t a gaming platform anyway.
After all, we anticipated efficiency drops; the actual query is whether or not the brand new eight-core Plus chips are aggressive of their value section. Qualcomm says they’ll begin as little as $799.

Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
Apple’s “price range” MacBook Air ($1095 at Amazon) sports activities a barely older Apple M2 chip that’s additionally based mostly on the Arm structure. The excellent news is that even the weaker Snapdragon X Plus mannequin is aggressive on single-core and bests the Apple M2 for multi-core CPU efficiency. That’s fairly the inside track.
Nevertheless, the MacBook Air’s highly effective 8-core GPU flies previous the Snapdragon X Plus fashions in 3DMark’s graphics take a look at. It affords about double the efficiency of the lowest-end Qualcomm chip, making it a extra succesful gaming platform and lending it a lift for GPU-accelerated work. Relying in your workload, the MacBook may nonetheless be a greater wager.
Qualcomm scores a win over the MacBook Air, but it surely’s not a slam dunk.
After all, benchmarks aren’t all the time reflective of the precise efficiency you’ll see in the actual world. We’ve had a hit-and-miss expertise with Microsoft’s Prism emulator, which might knock fairly a couple of proportion factors off the efficiency of x64 Home windows purposes working on Arm. We’re additionally nonetheless ready on a couple of extra attention-grabbing use instances for these 45 TOPS of NPU efficiency in addition to the so-so Home windows Recall.
So, must you run out and purchase one in every of these extra reasonably priced Snapdragon X Plus PCs? Nicely, it is dependent upon the worth and which chip you get. The ASUS Vivobook S15 benchmarked right here prices $1,299.99, a reasonably uncooked deal provided that it’s proper on the backside of the pack performance-wise. I’d purchase the brand new Microsoft Floor Laptop computer ($999 at Microsoft), which has a much more highly effective Snapdragon X Elite chip. Nevertheless, the Lenovo ThinkBook 16 Gen 7 will begin at round $749, making it a way more compelling price range Copilot Plus PC choice.
👇Observe extra 👇
👉 bdphone.com
👉 ultraactivation.com
👉 trainingreferral.com
👉 shaplafood.com
👉 bangladeshi.assist
👉 www.forexdhaka.com
👉 uncommunication.com
👉 ultra-sim.com
👉 forexdhaka.com
👉 ultrafxfund.com
👉 ultractivation.com
👉 bdphoneonline.com