NASA and Boeing shifting forward with Starliner check flight after propulsion points

LOS ANGELES — NASA and Boeing are making ready for a June 1 launch of the corporate’s CST-100 Starliner on a crewed check flight after evaluation of a helium leak led to the invention of a “design vulnerability” within the spacecraft’s propulsion system.

At a Might 24 briefing, officers mentioned they consider a helium leak detected in a response management system (RCS) thruster within the spacecraft’s service module is brought on by a faulty seal in a flange that’s itself an remoted downside. Not one of the different thrusters have proven proof of helium leaks after in depth testing.

Engineers found the leak shortly after the Might 6 launch scrub for the Crew Flight Check (CFT) mission brought on by an unrelated valve downside within the Atlas 5 rocket’s Centaur higher stage. Testing within the days after the scrub brought on the leak to worsen.

Steve Stich, NASA business crew program supervisor, mentioned engineers consider {that a} seal, a rubber ring concerning the measurement of a shirt button and the thickness of 10 sheets of paper, within the flange had a defect that grew worse throughout assessments. He mentioned different prospects included an error putting in the seal or overseas object particles that rubbed in opposition to the seal.

NASA and Boeing concluded that Starliner can fly with the leak as-is. “If we have been to take away the seal utterly,” mentioned Mark Nappi, Boeing vp and business crew program supervisor, “the leak price wouldn’t exceed {our capability} to handle that leak. That made us snug that, if this leak have been to worsen, it could be acceptable to fly.”

The shortage of leaks in different thrusters led NASA to conclude that there isn’t any systemic downside. “Now we have an evaluation that backs that up, that claims we don’t count on the others to leak,” Stich mentioned. “That’s the boldness that we’ve that we don’t have a common-cause failure mode.”

“That is actually not a safety-of-flight subject for ourselves, and we consider that we’ve a well-understood situation that we will handle,” Nappi concluded.

Whereas the examine of the helium leak was ongoing, Stich mentioned engineers carried out a assessment of the remainder of the propulsion system “simply to ensure we didn’t have some other issues that we must be involved about.”

That assessment did flip up one thing he known as a “design vulnerability” with Starliner’s propulsion system the place, in a uncommon circumstance, the spacecraft wouldn’t have the ability to carry out a deorbit burn if two adjoining “doghouses” that include RCS and bigger orbital maneuvering and perspective management (OMAC) thrusters failed. That failure, he mentioned, would knock out sufficient OMAC and RCS thrusters to forestall current backup plans for finishing up a deorbit burn from being applied.

Engineers developed a brand new deorbit reentry mode that might use two burns of 4 RCS thrusters in that state of affairs. Such a failure mode can be “very distant,” Nappi mentioned, showing in lower than one % of potential mixtures of failures.

“It’s a reasonably diabolical case,” Stich mentioned.

It raised the query, although, of why the design vulnerability was not present in evaluations throughout Starliner’s prolonged improvement. “The helium leak itself brought on us to look a bit extra intimately” about how components of the propulsion system work together, Stich mentioned. “It simply took us a bit time to determine this out now. The query is, ought to we’ve seen this earlier? Perhaps in an ideal timeframe we’d have recognized this earlier.”

Officers emphasised this was a part of the information gained throughout a check flight program. Nappi mentioned Boeing was a number of everlasting fixes to the issue, utilizing some mixture of {hardware} modifications and software program modifications, for later Starliner missions.

After two weeks of intensive work on Starliner, groups are taking a break over the Memorial Day vacation weekend earlier than resuming last preparations for the launch, scheduled for June 1 at 12:25 p.m. Japanese. That features a new flight check readiness assessment on Might 29, adopted by rollout of the Atlas 5 carrying Starliner to the launch pad Might 30.

There are backup launch alternatives for the mission June 2, 5 and 6. Nevertheless, limited-life gadgets on the Atlas 5 rocket might lead to a for much longer delay if Starliner doesn’t launch for much longer after that.

Gary Wentz, vp of presidency and business applications at United Launch Alliance, mentioned the corporate recurrently assessments ordnance utilized in flight termination and different methods on the rocket, however these “expire” later in June and July and must get replaced.

He steered that work might result in an extended delay as ULA reshuffles its launch manifest. “A few of it’s going to come all the way down to a prioritization of missions all through the remainder of the 12 months,” he mentioned, with the corporate working with NASA and the House Power on figuring out which missions ought to fly in what order.

The 2 NASA astronauts who will fly on Starliner on the CFT mission, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, are again in Houston however remaining in pre-flight medical quarantine as they await their subsequent launch alternative. Stich mentioned they have been taking the delay in stride. “They’re in good spirits,” he mentioned. “I feel they fear about us typically greater than we fear about them.”

Associated